Responding
to "Ethnic-Krahn Hater"
25 April 04
I am writing this in response
to what an Isaac B. Rue wrote (Ethnic
Krahn Hater)
concerning the use of the _expression "ethnic-Krahn".
True, in all forms of journalism we should avoid misleading
our readers and inciting others to hatred. In this case,
however, I see no such thing; it is the sad fact Isaac, the
very very sad fact.
I do believe that you as a
Liberian, and very sentimental as you are, do know of the
atrocities that were committed by these various rebel groups.
It pains us to know that, not Krahn nor Gio, but LIBERIANS
were the ones slaughtering their fellow Liberians. When
Taylor first came to Liberia with his rebel group, we all
knew he had used the animosity the people of Nimba had
against Doe and those from his county. The tribes that were
mostly victims of killings by his group were the Krahn and
the Mandingo. We all knew at the time Taylor's forces were
dominated by that ethnic group. Now tell me, would it have
been wrong for you to make that known to the world, that
Taylor was using the Gio in his pursuit for power? That's
what he did, and we all did say so one time or another; did
that make us in any way a 'Gio hate monger'?
It has been proven that the
MODEL rebel group is dominated by those of the Krahn ehtnic
group. I have very good friends that belong to that ethnic
group. They do know that I do not begrudge them for what
others did. It is only foolish to take your anger up on
others when they are not the reason for which individuals do
wrong. Is it Tom (Kamara) to blame for those of the
Krahn ethnic group taking up arms to kill others? Just to
bring to your attention, there was an article appearing on
BBC online June 10 of 2003 which mentioned the LURD group as
being "dominated by members of the Mandingo ethnic
group, who also formed most of the Ulimo-K faction" and
MODEL fighters being "mostly ethnic
Krahns - again a flashback to the earlier civil war and the
Ulimo-J faction." What
would you say of that? Were they wrong in there assertion? Were
they, to quote you, "Krahn hate mongers"?
One thing I gathered from
your e-mail to Tom is your own mental attitude toward what
happened and what is still happening in Liberia. I do
understand your frustration over the name calling, but in
this case it is not so; Tom is presenting a fact, a fact
that we all know oh so well. You are definitely a peace
loving Liberian. If the fact that members of the Krahn
ethnic group is mentioned as being dominantly a part of
a certain rebel group shamed you, then be shamed over the
atrocities these ones have committed, as we all are, and not
over the idea that they are Krahn; when it comes down to it
all, they are all Liberians and that reflects on us all --
even the Tom himself. So what is the essence of your strong
words on a fellow Liberian who is making you and the world
aware of what is happening in Liberia? Isn't it time that we
focus on things that brings out the good in us? Think about
this Isaac, I know you would.
Trokon T.